The App Store on Your Phone Is Full of Junky Crap. I Love These Shoes That Make Me Feel Fast.Īlways Flip Off Your Friends’ Doorbell Cameras What 24 Hours Looks Like in Three Prisons Though CEO Mark Zuckerberg argued that platforms should not be the “arbiters of truth,” he apparently thought Facebook should serve that role for health information. For example, when Facebook tried to take a free speech stand in October by allowing politicians to disseminate misinformation in ads, it did carve out an exception by asserting that the platform would remove anti-vaccine ads, no matter who purchased them. While social media platforms have traditionally been permissive when it comes to hate speech and conspiracy theories, they’ve generally treated medical misinformation as a third-rail issue. for sharing a viral video of medical professionals discussing their views on Hydroxychloroquine is further proof that Big Tech is intent on killing free expression online and is another instance of them committing election interference to stifle Republican voices.” Andrew Surabian, a spokesperson for Trump Jr., said in a statement, “Twitter suspending Don Jr. Twitter took similar actions against Arizona GOP chairwoman Kelli Ward after she shared the same video.Īlready, Trump Jr.’s confederates have been using this latest incident to sharpen their allegations that tech companies are engaging in political censorship. One of those users was Donald Trump Jr., who tweeted out the video with the caption, “This is a much watch!!! So different from the narrative that everyone is running with.” As a consequence, Twitter blocked the president’s son tweeting, retweeting, following, or liking anything on the platform for 12 hours. A viral video, which touted the discredited coronavirus remedy hydroxychloroquine and claimed that people don’t need to wear masks, caught the attention of millions of users, leading the platforms to remove posts of the video and ban accounts. ![]() On Monday and Tuesday, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter tried to put out a misinformation wildfire. The violence is both more overt and insane, and it also goes down even smoother in 2023, despite being more recognizable as a real threat.This article is part of the Free Speech Project, a collaboration between Future Tense and the Tech, Law, & Security Program at American University Washington College of Law that examines the ways technology is influencing how we think about speech. And yet, despite the fact that everything he said was so obviously more serious-because we have learned, firsthand, that no, he is not joking-it barely causes a ripple. Now, when Trump threatens a law clerk or pledges to use the Justice Department to “go after” the Biden family, we don’t need to wonder if he really means it. Indeed, such comments elicited days of horrified coverage and repetition and debate. Back then, when Trump would trash-talk a Gold Star family or insult a judge with a Mexican-sounding name or mock someone with a disability, we all wondered if he really meant it. Two things have changed since Trump came onto the scene eight years ago with this kind of bluster. Which is why we should stop asking why the message is still allowed to happen and start asking when it became distilled down to constitutional elevator music. What has changed-what has morphed unrecognizably-is how it’s being received. ![]() ![]() Rank senility notwithstanding, Trump’s word choice and manner haven’t changed appreciably in the years since he took office. What he says is not really all that much more horrifying now than when he called all Mexicans rapists in 2015. Let’s be clear: Those people are making a staggering category error. As ever, there are observers arguing that Trump has just lost temporary control of his mouth when he says these things.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |